ISRAEL N. EISENBERG
III. What is the Prognosis?
A. BERNARD ACKERMAN, M.D.
IV. Verdict in the Case of Dubin vs. Thomas Jefferson University et al.
V. Implication for Prognosis of "Vascular Invasion" By Neoplastic Cells of a Primary Melanoma
MICHAEL EMBERGER, M.D.
VI. Hemangiolymphatic Invasion at the Site of a Primary Cutaneous Melanoma is Virtually Equivalent to Metastasis
ANON PAICHITROJJANA, M.D.
VII. Professors in the Courtroom—A Follow-Up to A Trial in Philadelphia: "Academics" in the Courtroom
A. BERNARD ACKERMAN, M.D.
VIII. Comment
PETER C. KOPFF, ESQ.
IX. Medical-Legal
GEOFFREY J. GOTTLIEB, M.D.
X. A Follow-up to "Professors in the Courtroom"
A. BERNARD ACKERMAN, M.D.
XI. Correspondence
XII. Response of W. Clark Lambert, M.D. Ph.D. and Reply to Dr. Lambert by A. Bernard Ackerman, M.D.
W. CLARK LAMBERT, M.D. PH.D. AND A. BERNARD ACKERMAN, M.D.
XIII. The Behavior of Physicians in the Courtroom: Just Human?
A. BERNARD ACKERMAN, M.D.
XIV. Correspondence with State Boards of Medical Examiners of Massachusetts, Pennsylvania and New Jersey
XV. Correspondence with the AMA
XVI. Another Follow-up to Professors in the Courtroom: Fitzpatrick's Recent Deposition and a Critique of It
A. BERNARD ACKERMAN, M.D.
XVII. Another Follow-up to Professors in the Courtroom: A Letter to the Editor of the Archives of Dermatology
A. BERNARD ACKERMAN, M.D.
XVIII. Correspondence with State Medical Societies of Massachusetts, Pennsylvania and New Jersey
XIX. Correspondence with the AAD
XX. New York State Department of Health: Physician Profile
